[aprssig] Re: aprssig Digest, Vol 43, Issue 8

[Rodney Baker]

On Wednesday 09 January 2008 03:22:30 "Jason KG4WSV" <kg4wsv at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jan 8, 2008 9:58 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
> > Partly right.  Because the uncertainty is not a precise polygon;
> > it is a lack of additional precision.  It is an uncertanty of
> > the number of digits of precision by the sender, and an EXACT
> > transfer of that same uncertany to the recepient.
>
> So it's not precise, but it is exact. I'll have to think about that one.
> Maybe it depends on what my definition of is is?

You need to re-read Bob's sentence. What is EXACT is the "transfer of that 
same uncertainty to the recipient".



-- 
===================================================
Rodney Baker VK5ZTV
rodney.baker at optusnet.com.au
===================================================