[aprssig] APRS-XO proposal
Scott Miller scott at opentrac.orgThu Jan 10 17:59:26 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS-XO proposal
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS-XO proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
So construct a UDP gateway that expects the first few bytes of the packet to contain the authorization information. It's not like there's any strong protection in the first place. TCP is not a good choice for highly mobile devices with unreliable connections. Scott N1VG AE5PL Lists wrote: > APRS-IS does not accept UDP packets due to the lack of verification. > Just an FYI. > > CWOP folks connect, log on, send their packet, and disconnect. True, > there is more overhead but it works and reduces potential abuse issues. > > 73, > > Pete Loveall AE5PL > pete at ae5pl net > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Scott Miller >> Posted At: Thursday, January 10, 2008 10:08 AM >> Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS-XO proposal >> >> If anyone's going to write a transmit-only tracker application, can it >> PLEASE use UDP? If it's not kept open all the time, a TCP connection >> is >> going to require 3 packets to connect, 1 packet for data, and 3 > packets >> to disconnect. And keeping it open all the time probably isn't a good >> idea for a device that might be moving from one network to another all >> the time. You probably don't want old positions stuck in buffers, >> either. > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS-XO proposal
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS-XO proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
