[aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change?
The Bland Ranch root at blandranch.netSat Jan 12 03:06:21 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
As much as this is a basically good idea, how much of these responses would be wasted becuase the originater is dumb tracker and can't receive anything? Chuck Bland NA6BR Quoting Derek Koonce <derek at dkoonce.com>: > How about something in the system that sends back to a broadcaster a > message that their format is incorrect? This is in the hopes to get > those WIDE4-4 people using the correct path. This may be a difficult > thing, but could go something like: > > 1. Broadcaster uses WIDE4-4 in path. > 2. Digi / Igate sees this sequence in the path and broadcasts back to > that station a message. > > Granted this would generate new messages being transmitted in the area, > but could help alert people. > > Derek Koonce > KE6JTP > > > > Rich Mazzeo wrote: > > > > Hi Mark, all I have so far is: > > > > ___The decaying transmission algorithm for position, messages, > > objects. (i.e. don't let the user pick the rate, let winaprs pick the > > decay rate like DOS does > > > > ___A warning to users who enter WIDE4-4 or worse in the default path box. > > > > ___Objects: some way to draw them with the mouse similar to DOS. Maybe > > a separate line in the drop down menu under "Add/Edit Station" and > > "weather" objects, that lets me pick "open triangle, filled triangle, > > line, color, etc". When I hit ok it will let me draw it and approve > > before transmitting.(something close to that). Currently it's very > > easy to send an object with a bad format or none at all. > > > > ___TCP/IP Filter: Someone just brought that up. As of now I have to > > block all incoming TCP/IP traffic and serve as an incoming gate only. > > Otherwise the station list will fill up and boot the RF stations off. > > A distance filter would really work well, whether internal, or in the > > TCP/IP settings to send the distance request directly to the server. A > > separate list and memory allocations for TCP/IP stations altogether is > > another thought. like "max TCP/IP stations = x" type of thing that > > keeps RF stations separate. Bonus points for a check box somewhere > > that lets me "Display RF stations" and "Display TCP/IP" stations, so I > > can show either TCP or RF or both on my map. > > > > Some bugs I've noticed : > > > > ___Settings > Alternate VHF Path > Other... won't change the path no > > matter what I type in there. > > ___Settings > Alternate VHF Path > the paths I have in altpath.txt > > aren't being sent, it's as if altpath.txt is corrupted, but it looks > > fine. > > > > ___Messaging: when entering an alternate path in the "send message" > > box, it is not implemented and just sends the message with the current > > path. > > > > ___Warning/Danger radius: WinAPRS doesn't seem to take any action when > > a moving station passes within my set limits, could be user error. > > > > Feature requests: > > > > ___Messaging: Bring back the backslash! If I recall correctly I used > > to be able to hit backslash on a queued message to disable (kill) it. > > Right now my only option is to "fake ack" it with the "=" or > > "backspace" key. The end result is the same, but when I come back > > later, I can't always remember if I "fake acked" it or if the other > > station really got it. > > > > ___Messaging: I wish there was a way to "transmit all un-acked > > messages now". (Like the N key in the message window, but will send > > any message marked as "Q". this would really come in handy when I am > > taking APRS checkins for Skywarn > > > > ___Messaging: Rather than the current path options on the send message > > dialog, how about 5 radio buttons for path choice: -None-, Default > > (the default), and the other 3 would be the first 3 paths from our > > altpath.txt file. Altpath1, Altpath2, Altpath3. > > > > ___Messaging: A warning, or "remaining character count" when our > > message will be sent with 2 or more packets. When RF conditions are > > tough, I'd like to try and fit it all in one line rather than risk 1 > > or 2 words spilling over to a second packet that might not make it. > > > > ___Weather: Any plan on supporting La Crosse weather stations? > > > > > > I came up with most of this on the fly right now just based on my own > > user experience. I'm sure someone will chime in if anything I put > > down is already done or is the results of user error. > > > > Regards, > > Rich > > N3XKU > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Sproul" <kb2ici at amsat.org> > > To: "Rich Mazzeo" <forummail at richmazz.com>; "TAPR APRS Mailing List" > > <aprssig at lists.tapr.org> > > Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change? > > > > > >> Rich > >> > >> Please send me a list of what you see needs to be implemented in WinAPRS > >> > >> Mark > >> > >> > >>> I will second this. I currently use WinAPRS, but as Brian > >>> stated, many of the features Bob intended were never implemented as > >>> planned. And now, WinAPRS hasn't been updated in over a year and a > >>> half. If there was a way to get APRSDOS as a windows app and > >>> function the way it was intended (tiger map support would be awesome > >>> too!), I would gladly chip in a secondary "windows port" fee. It > >>> just seems there is nothing else out there at the moment for windows > >>> thats easy to install and use. > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Rich > >>> N3XKU > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >> Mark Sproul | > >> http://ecs.rutgers.edu | > >> msproul at jove.rutgers.edu | > >> Manager - Engineering Computing Services | 732-445-3121 > >> Rutgers University School of Engineering | > >> Office: Eng D111 | > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprssig mailing list > > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change?
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS DOS a time for change?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
