[aprssig] APRS Reply ACKS and message lesson 101
Doug Cox jdmcox at jdmcox.comWed Jan 16 22:10:27 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Reply ACKS and message lesson 101
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on Rovers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I can answer my own question, which was: <Quote> Sorry to ask a question that must be stupid because it's never asked, but: Why doesn't the client program that sends the data (of any kind) repeatedly send it again in 10 seconds if it doesn't receive that data back from a digipeater? This method requires a digipeater, of course, but they seem necessary to the proper functioning of APRS. And once a digipeater gets the data, can't it re-send it without a blocked transmission? Thus 1 hop data should be guaranteed to arrive. Is there anything wrong with this logic? <Unquote> Sure, using the quoted method, the data can be received and re-sent by a digipeater, no problem. The problem is that the digipeater's re-transmission could still be stepped-on by other transmissions from other digipeaters, and so not received by the intended receiver. So now I understand APRS Reply ACKS and message lesson 101. Doug Cox _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig _________________________________
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS Reply ACKS and message lesson 101
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS on Rovers
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
