[aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft?
Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.comMon Jan 21 18:48:50 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft?
- Next message: [aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I like it! GPS receiver at 120 RPM! Experimentation, sign of the true ham spirit! hi hi Carry on! 73, Cap KE6AFE "Learn by destroying" - Jeff AE6KS -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Jason KG4WSV Sent: Monday, January 21, 2008 07:57 AM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft? I don't know about speed, but I was concerned about the GPS18 locking while facing the horizon (antenna 90 degrees from optimal) and spinning, so I rigged up a little test. I spun a GPS18 at about 120RPM (powered on the GPS and started spinning immediately). It locked and maintained lock until the impromptu test rig self destructed. -Jason kg4wsv -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20080121/95714a4a/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft?
- Next message: [aprssig] Better of two GPS units for high speed aircraft?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
