[aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
Pete Loveall AE5PL Lists hamlists at ametx.comTue Jul 8 10:37:38 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
- Next message: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Scott Miller > Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:42 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles? > > Please explain in more detail why this channel (the 1200 bps data > portion of the D-STAR DV stream, not a separate RF channel, we > understand that already) can't be used for arbitrary data. Icom's > marketing implies that it can. I didn't say that you can't put arbitrary data into the Icom data port. I said that there is no "data channel". It is not implemented that way. I think the Mic-E analogy post that I referenced should be help clarify this to most people familiar with the Mic-E transmission design (again, not the Mic-E packet format, but the transmission methodology). > > Please read my post demonstrating the basic comparison of D-PRS/D- > STAR and your Mic-E concept. If you are still confused, please contact > me offline and I will try to explain that comparison. > > Pete, I'm not sure if you're just not explaining it very well or if > you're being intentionally obtuse, but I've tried to follow the > explanation and Bob's not the only one who's not getting it. Have a > little patience with us, and I'm sure we can get it straightened out. Again, if you understand why the Mic-E design was unidirectional, then you will understand why you don't want to use D-STAR DV as a data protocol. I am not being "intentionally obtuse". In fact, it seems, many others understood the Mic-E analogy which puts it into terms most long-time APRS participants understand. I am sorry if it is a difficult concept that using a voice transmission medium as a data transmission medium on a frequency that is primarily used for voice is problematic at best and interfering at worst. Sometimes, "what can be done" is not a good use of a communications medium because of significant detriments to the primary use of the communications channel. 73, Pete Loveall AE5PL pete at ae5pl dot net
- Previous message: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
- Next message: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
