[aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
Pete Loveall AE5PL Lists
hamlists at ametx.com
Tue Jul 8 10:17:09 CDT 2008
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Miller
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2008 10:04 AM
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] PIC processor for APRS info for D-STAR mobiles?
> Pete, this is what I meant by 'deliberately obtuse.' Your response to
Asking people to do a little due diligence is not "deliberately obtuse". It is "deliberately not repeating what is already published".
> sub-channel works and how it might be applied, and I for one don't want
> to join a D-STAR group and sort through all of the misinformation to
> to figure out if D-STAR is even something I want to mess with. So
You don't have a problem with the misinformation disseminated here ;-)
> again, if you want APRS users to seriously consider D-PRS, have a
> patience and help us understand its capabilities and limitations.
To be honest, I don't care whether APRS users seriously consider D-PRS or not. APRS users should use the modes that best fit their requirements. I do care whether D-STAR users seriously consider D-PRS since it gives them access to the very good APRS client applications available. As Rich pointed out, if a user buys a D-STAR radio with the intent to use that radio in D-STAR digital mode for APRS, they are going to be sadly disappointed because D-STAR DV is not a data protocol like AX.25 over FM. If they buy a D-STAR radio for the other attributes that D-STAR offers (built-in AVRS-like capabilities, for instance), then they will be likely to look into using APRS clients (or APRS-IS database clients like aprs.fi) as an added feature which will bring them to looking at D-PRS.
Sorry if you consider my responses "obtuse". I don't consider it "obtuse" to ask people read documents and web pages readily available on the Internet and not discuss them on a SIG where the discussion is clearly off-topic.
Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete at ae5pl dot net
More information about the aprssig