[aprssig] Mic-E Issues
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Jul 16 01:32:31 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Is this base 91 compatiable with Mic-e ? >> Many out there would be wondering All APRS formats are compatible. They get converted to LAT/LONG and the same text on receipt. I am leary of using the base-91 compressed encoding because it had been used so rarely, and enough authors are no longer supporting their code, that I worry as to whether a base-91 encoded position will be properly received by all parties. And if one does not have full confidence that what he transmits will be received, then it's a little iffy to use it in my opinon. For example, the older Kenwoods do not properly decode a "compressed-base-91 OBJECT". SO no one should ever use base-91 compression for an object or 85% of the mobiles will not see it... Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
