[aprssig] Mic-E Issues
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Jul 16 14:11:29 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> ... Mic-E in my section of the U.S. gives a > precision of about 40' by 60'. Base-91 gives > something like 2' x 3'.... > Of course this begs the questions: What datum > are these people using... and what is the accuracy > of their current GPS position? Without > transmitting HDOP and datum and decoding that in > the display software, this improved precision > capability of Base-91 is partially unused. For what it is worth, that is why we came up with the !DAO! Format which adds precision down to about a foot while also providing a byte for identifying the Datum between the sender and the receiver. See: http://www.ew.usna.edu/~bruninga/aprs/datum.txt A benefit of the !DAO! Format is that it is backwards compatible with all existing applications. Existing applications will display the existing precision to the nearest 60 feet, but those that decode the additional !DAO! Can use the additional precision and dataum infromation. Though in my mind, for something like APRS, if you are within 60 feet of an APRS station or object you are basically there! Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Next message: [aprssig] Mic-E Issues
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
