[aprssig] tactical call identifier packet
Wes Johnston, AI4PX wes at ai4px.comWed Jul 23 18:45:11 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] tactical call identifier packet
- Next message: [aprssig] tactical call identifier packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Agreed... but how do I know that 0x1234567890 is the OIC? and 0x4567988473 is the NCOIC? Wes On 7/23/08, Joel Maslak <jmaslak-aprs at antelope.net> wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2008, at 12:25 PM, Wes Johnston, AI4PX wrote: > > > In the case of RFID cards, they have fixed serial numbers, and > > we'll be transmitting those serial numbers over the air as the name > > of an object, or as the name of a station. We need someway to map > > the serial number of the RFID card to a callsign. Doesn't matter > > whether we transmit as an object or posit packet, it still needs to > > have the serial number converted to a callsign. > > > The packet's "From" address in an object packet, IIRC, should be a > valid callsign of the sending station. That lets other stations know > who sent the object. > > The packet's object name would be the serial number. > > So every object packet could include both. It would also let one > sending station have 200 RFID cards if needed. > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at lists.tapr.org > https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > -- Wes --- Where there's silence, there is no Hope. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20080723/f1cfe6c7/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] tactical call identifier packet
- Next message: [aprssig] tactical call identifier packet
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
