[aprssig] IRLP APRS Status Script: Multiconnect Bug?
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Jul 25 12:56:34 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] IRLP APRS Status Script: Multiconnect Bug?
- Next message: [aprssig] IRLP APRS Status Script: Multiconnect Bug?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> ... some of the IRLP nodes are connected to several > Tier 2 servers... Looking at the IRLP APRS script(4.0 )... I just checked FINDU and of the first 6 IRLP Objects out of 50, only one is in the correct recommended IRLP/APRS frequency standard format. We need to figure out why this script is not yielding the consistency we need? In this list, I cut out the date/lat/long so they fit better: ;IRLP-4740*442.600MHz T141 R20m OFFLINE [Yes, correct! ;IRLP1148 *147570S100IDLE R15Km [No . & no - ;IRLP-8045*146940s123IDLE [No . ;IRLP-8549*431.640MHz simplex PL123Hz >REF9504 [C overlay? ;IRLP-4942*446325-146IDLE [no . Tone fmt? ;IRLP-4090*442850+71IDLE [no . Tone fmt? ;IRLP-8045*146940s123IDLE [has Freq in CALLSIGN field IRLP8045>APVR30,TCPIP*,qAC,T2MIDWEST: The objective is the following format to show on all APRS maps and GPS units and radios the location, frequency, tone and range of nearby IRLP nodes: ;IRLP-NNNN*FFF.FFFMHz Tnnn RXXm STATUS Where IRLP-NNNN is the object name Where Tnnn is the tone in Hz (no tenths) with leading zero Where RXXm is subjective useable range in miles (or km) Where STATUS is the present node status. See www.aprs.org/localinfo.html Where can we correct the IRLP information and docs to get everyone onto the same page? The format did evolve over the last 4 years or so, and so it is expected that we will have to clean this up after the fact... Even my docs may be confusing? Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] IRLP APRS Status Script: Multiconnect Bug?
- Next message: [aprssig] IRLP APRS Status Script: Multiconnect Bug?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
