[aprssig] Time to UPGRADE obsolete DIGIS!

John Ronan jronan at tssg.org
Sun Jun 8 15:39:59 CDT 2008

On 8 Jun 2008, at 19:08, Jan T. Pharo wrote:

> "Bob Bruninga " <bruninga at usna.edu>, Sun,  8 Jun 2008 12:54:01 -0400
> (EDT)
>> All "Traceable WIDEn-N" does is put WIDEn-N in the UITRACE  
>> parameter so it is traceable and eliminate all other obsolete  
>> paths.  So still it does what the word means, makes all APRS  
>> packets "traceable".
> Well, obviously, when one has a parameter word TRACE and a parameter
> word WIDE, it's only natural that the word WIDE is used when
> TRACE-able paths should be used. Of course.
> Just to think that the word TRACE should be used according to its word
> meaning is ridiculous, isn't it?
> now, seriously:
Before we get serious... what was wrong with using relayn-n? ;)

> However, when the region 1 recommendation eventually comes, we'll
> probably use it region-wide.

If there is knowledgeable, full and frank debate, then yeah...

John Ronan <jronan at tssg.org>, +353-51-302938
Telecommunications Software &  Systems Group,  http://www.tssg.org

More information about the aprssig mailing list