[aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise
Ian ik7565 at verizon.netSun Jun 29 19:34:04 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Who's jamming who here? The Garmin III+ and Garmin V have a nice little birdie on 147.315MHz which happens to be my club's repeater output. Ian N8IK -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org] On Behalf Of Brian Webster Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 11:36 AM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise What about the idea of using the car radio tuned to the station that jammed the Garmin GPS V? If you were listening on the GPS frequency for that signal source everything would be legal. Just an idea... Thank You, Brian N2KGC -----Original Message----- From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Greg D. Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 3:28 AM To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Subject: Re: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise ---------------------------------------- > From: ve7gdh at rac.ca > To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org > Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:09:08 -0700 > Subject: Re: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise > > Greg KO6TH wrote... > >> It would seem to me that this is an untapped opportunity for the Ham >> community to freshen up our T-hunting skills, and be ready for the day >> when these things become more than just a nuisance. The trick is, how >> would you practice this legally? We can't exactly deploy one of these >> in the woods somewhere without violating the law ourselves... > > You could just locate existing sources of jamming sigals and notify the > authorities without violating any laws. Setting up a jamming device > yourself would be a different story. However, if one was deployed in the > woods, it shouldn't affect anyone else if the effective jamming range > was only 10 - 20 metres. If it had a much greater range, you might not > be the only ones tracking it down. (Bring your earplugs!) > > 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH > -- Right, in an actual incident we would only need to receive. But, how would we know ahead of time that our equipment would actually detect the interference, and how would we practice using the equipment to actually locate something? My reference to the woods regarded where many hidden transmitter hunts are held. Setting up a jammer that wasn't near anything worth jamming would still be illegal, no? Besides, it would have to ID every 10 minutes, which would kind of give it away... Greg KO6TH _________________________________________________________________ Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL _Refresh_messenger_062008 _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at lists.tapr.org https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.101 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1522 - Release Date: 6/27/2008 8:27 AM
- Previous message: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise
- Next message: [aprssig] GPS Jamming On The Rise
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
