[aprssig] Voice Repeater ==> APRS Interface
Corey Shields cshields at indiana.eduFri May 9 01:56:58 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater ==> APRS Interface
- Next message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater ==> APRS Interface
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Bruninga wrote: > Yes, and I think it would not take more than about a few dozen > lines of code to do a rudimentary conversion from DTMF callsign > to APRS packet and is trivial for someone to add to such > dedicated micros if the implementer is motivated to do so. > You should see the dtmf logs of a repeater with such functionality (like IRLP) sometime.. Unless the repeater is dedicated to aprstt only when it comes to dtmf, then how do you differentiate between a good command and junk? At least in our case (IRLP and Echolink on the repeater), something so simple as "111" to turn the IRLP node on and then 4 digits to dial a node invites a log full of random DTMF attempts and rejected numbers. With varying numbers in callsign digits you can't expect a set string length, and this becomes more complex when you consider repeating characters (take an old club I once belonged to, W9UUU.. on the keypad someone might try 99999888888.. which could also be W9VV, W9TVU, XY8TT, etc..) As your doc states, the proper way to do this would be 9A999988A88A88, but I bring this up to point out that all it takes is one goof on the dtmf pad to screw it up. How important is it that the data be correct? Goes back to the issue of a log full of people who can't even get an IRLP connection up with DTMF, something that takes far less in my opinion. So while it would take just a few dozen lines of code to create a callsign out of a DTMF string, making sure you get what the user intended (and differentiating that from IRLP and Echolink commands) would be a bit of a PITA. Again, I love the idea of allowing 100% of the hams to show up on APRS. Maybe go for the low-hanging fruit and make a web form that allows the majority of them sitting behind a rig at home to just ID themselves to APRS-IS. And as you pointed out, the hobby is one of experimentation and coming up with new things. Maybe if you got this to work as-is now, idea 2.0 would solve some of these issues.. Good luck. Cheers, -Corey KB9JHU -- Corey Shields High Performance Systems, Indiana University - UITS http://rtinfo.uits.indiana.edu/hps
- Previous message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater ==> APRS Interface
- Next message: [aprssig] Voice Repeater ==> APRS Interface
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
