[aprssig] REF: HF Net? How About 20M ?

[Dave Baxter]

Oooo, please no!  Keep 14.100 clear for the NCDXF IBP project.  There is
more than enough QRM on 20m round there already without APRS/packet type
stuff too...   It's bad enough with RTTY contests!

The IBP also uses 18.110, 21.150, 24.930 & 28.200.  A lack of
QRM/Splatter etc, is much appreciated round these.

Cheers.

Dave G0WBX.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Stennett [mailto:wa4tkg at iwon.com] 
> Sent: 26 May 2008 02:08
> To: aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> Subject: [aprssig] REF: HF Net? How About 20M ?
> 
> 
> I have long believed we should have a 20M APRS frequency.
> 
> I have had little to NO success in getting many stations on 30M APRS.
> 
> There has always been a presence of Packet on 20M, the .105 
> Net is proof of that.
> 
> There should be an APRS spot, either 5KHz above ? or below 
> the .105 Net.
> 
> ...that's my 2c worth.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> From: g0jxn.jim [mailto: g0jxn.jim at ntlworld.com]
> 
> 
> 
>      Cc: aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> 
> Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 07:26:00 +0100
> 
> Subject: HF Net
> 
> 
> 
> Sorry again for being off subject but there are few places to 
> air this.
> 
> I received no responses to my original message below so if 
> anyone is interested in joining me in setting up such a net please 
> 
> contact me direct or check my web site under the 'aprs hf net' 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
This mail has been scanned by Palmer Cook Computer Services Limited.  www.palmercook.co.uk