[aprssig] APRS radios

[Scott Miller]

  > Yep, instead of taking my original design which was verbally
> presented as I have presented it above (an OBJECT should be
> parsed identically to any other position format).  The Techincal
> author attempted then to do as you suggest, and that is
> re-specifiy every possible field in an Object.  Which in my mind
> was not a good idea, as it could lead to omissions and confusion
> as noted above. 

A formal grammar would NOT list all possibilities separately, it would 
explicitly show that the part following the name is the same as a 
position packet.

Any possibility in the next two years of getting an updated spec?  And I 
don't mean the errata page, but an actual edited document.

Scott
N1VG