[aprssig] APRS radios
scott at opentrac.org
Tue May 27 15:44:50 CDT 2008
> Yep, instead of taking my original design which was verbally
> presented as I have presented it above (an OBJECT should be
> parsed identically to any other position format). The Techincal
> author attempted then to do as you suggest, and that is
> re-specifiy every possible field in an Object. Which in my mind
> was not a good idea, as it could lead to omissions and confusion
> as noted above.
A formal grammar would NOT list all possibilities separately, it would
explicitly show that the part following the name is the same as a
Any possibility in the next two years of getting an updated spec? And I
don't mean the errata page, but an actual edited document.
More information about the aprssig