[aprssig] Local Info Objects
Greenhalgh, Christopher K. cgreenhalgh at studentaffairs.osu.eduWed May 28 18:46:28 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Local Info Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS HF Net
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > I got it...so this aids APRS (display) radios only. > > And HAMHUDs and laptops, etc... Which are over 85% of all > mobiles (in my area)... What good is APRS if mobiles aren't > watching it? Desktop/home/storm spotters/races/storm tracking all comes to mind. > > I'm curious...with all this talk about keeping > > transmissions short, I wonder how the scale > > of benefit-to-bandwidth would read... > > About 100%. Remember, these objects are only supposed to be > originated at-the-digi, and so the digi will not transmit them > until there is a clear slot that will not interfere with any > other packets or any users. It is free bandwidth. So the > benefit is very high. Sounds good. > > I'm in Columbus, Ohio, and know just about all > > the local users, and not one has an APRS radio, > > Wow, In that case, it appears that APRS in that area has been > reduced to nothing but an internet vehicle tracking system. Correct, and its sad. > Basically of no interest to anyone. Everyone is transmitting > and no one is watching. No wonder they cannot excite the rest > of ham radio to see it as a communications system... That's not quite true...I have 4 trackers (my Jeep, car, truck, and boat), and my family, friends, employer, ect. all enjoy tracking me via aprs.fi, and I know other locals doing the same thing, so there *is* interest. I know a couple guys who got their licenses because of APRS. > In fact, > driving through Columbus I saw far less activity than I used to > see in years past. Correct. I stated that in a previous comment. Most have decided to leave RF, and simply insert their data directly onto the internet. Or even sadder, mobiles inputting their data via cellular modems. :( > > however, I do see mobile stations "passing > > through" on I-70, but can't confirm what > > radio they are using. > > Most client software should display the equipment type. When I > look at a list of all mobiles here in our area... (just now) I > see 95 total mobiles. Of those, 75 are D700's, 11 are trackers, > 3 are D7 walkie talkies, 3 are unknowns and 1 is Uiview and 1 is > a NMEA tracker. So about 88% of them are two-way systems that > can see the world of HAM radio around them on APRS. (which is > what APRS is all about). I see. > If your area is only transmitting GPS data, then maybe it is > time to start an education campaign about how APRS is so much > more valuable and interesting to the users as an information and > communication service TO mobiles, not just one-way broadcasting. Well, I personally don't travel enough (outside of central Ohio) to justify an APRS rig, however, I still personally maintain Columbus' only high-profile digi, and home (RF) station as well (both out of my own pocket). > > When I'm on the road, I always carried a pocket repeater > > directory...it has served me fine over the years. :) > > Not my experience at all. There are over 10,000 listings, and > usually dozens listed in any given area. Of those, many of them > are dead with no one listening. And it takes a lot of one-hand > driving and page flipping to find the info! I keep my directory up to date when I do rarely land travel, and usually plan the repeaters on the way...I certainly wouldn't want to be close to anyone trying to read the pocket directory going 70 mph! ;) > I'd much rather > have the local community agree on the "best repeater" in an area > for travelers and transmit that to my mobile when I enter the > envelope of that service. Then I can tune it in (on the D710) > with the press of a single button. Or 6 presses on the Mic key > pad on other radios. I concur that it is a good application for those traveling thru, and have an APRS radio...one thing I have always tried to do, is keep up with the ever changing APRS specs, and I will update my digi ASAP. > Think outside of the tracker box. Driving around with a > broadcasting tracker is really of little value to a ham or > anyone else for that matter except for special events. Most > people could care less where someone else is. This is what > keeps too many people from considering APRS. There is little > value to them. Aside from my previous comments above, I still enjoy watching other stations, whether their tracking, or outputting weather info, but then...I'm an easily entertained guy. ;) > But put an APRS display in the mobile that can > show them everything going on around them live in ham radio, and > it starts to look a lot more interesting to the general ham. > And a lot more useful. Like I said Bob...I'm getting older, and don't travel terrestrially much at all...my 15 minute trek to work m-f doesn't justify it for me, but I see your points, and they are well taken. Like I said, I will update my digi ASAP. Thanks as always for your comments Bob! 73, Chris.
- Previous message: [aprssig] Local Info Objects
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS HF Net
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
