[aprssig] Proper DIGI Path
Keith VE7GDH ve7gdh at rac.caThu Sep 25 20:27:07 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] Proper DIGI Path
- Next message: [aprssig] Proper DIGI Path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Bob WB4APR wrote... > If the software implemented the human-activity-bit... To see if I could implement it, I did a search for "APRS human-activity-bit" and "APRS human present" and didn't have any success. I also searched the APRS spec (APRS Protocol Reference ver 1.0 edited by Ian Wadeor and published by TAPR in 2000... the one that still says "Automatic Position Reporting System" instead of "Automatic Packet Reporting System") and it didn't appear in there either. It would be really nice of the "APRS spec" and the various additions could all be put together into one document. Even more importantly, who will write it? Is there an "APRS Working Group" as mentioned in the "APRS spec" or is that basically you now? In other words, do APRS users get a say in how the APRS spec evolves? 73 es cul - Keith VE7GDH -- "I may be lost, but I know exactly where I am!"
- Previous message: [aprssig] Proper DIGI Path
- Next message: [aprssig] Proper DIGI Path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
