[aprssig] No More Mobile APRS In California
Dave Haynes dave at ep90.comFri Sep 26 16:02:39 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] No More Mobile APRS In California
- Next message: [aprssig] RC-D710 APRS display head on an old IC-2AT HT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
w2kb at comcast.net wrote: > New Jersey has a similar statute, but it exempts Amateur Radio. 73, ---Ken W2KB If it's of interest to anyone, it took me a good while but I found the relevant legislation here in the UK (quoted below). I suppose I could claim my quad-band mobile is exempt since it is certainly "designed or adapted" to operate on a frequency other than those listed. I don't think I'll be putting it to the test though. It does demonstrate how badly writtenlegislation creates dump loopholes though e.g. I could certainly use a skype wifi handset, connected to my wifi capable smartphone. Dave >From http://www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2003/20032695.htm The Road Vehicles (Construction and Use) (Amendment) (No. 4) Regulations 2003 says (Heavily snipped) :- 110. - (1) No person shall drive a motor vehicle on a road if he is using - (a) a hand-held mobile telephone; or (b) a hand-held device of a kind specified in paragraph (4). <snip> (4) A device referred to in paragraphs (1)(b), (2)(b) and (3)(b) is a device, other than a two-way radio, which performs an interactive communication function by transmitting and receiving data. <snip> (d) "two-way radio" means any wireless telegraphy apparatus which is designed or adapted - (i) for the purpose of transmitting and receiving spoken messages; and (ii) to operate on any frequency other than 880 MHz to 915 MHz, 925 MHz to 960 MHz, 1710 MHz to 1785 MHz, 1805 MHz to 1880 MHz, 1900 MHz to 1980 MHz or 2110 MHz to 2170 MHz; And from http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2006/PDF/ukpga_20060049_en.pdf The Road Safety Act 2006 says ... 26 Breach of requirements as to control of vehicle, mobile telephones etc. (1) Before section 42 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 insert— “41D Breach of requirements as to control of vehicle, mobile telephones etc. A person who contravenes or fails to comply with a construction and use requirement— (a) as to not driving a motor vehicle in a position which does not give proper control or a full view of the road and traffic ahead, or not causing or permitting the driving of a motor vehicle by another person in such a position, or (b) as to not driving or supervising the driving of a motor vehicle while using a hand-held mobile telephone or other hand-held interactive communication device, or not causing or permitting the driving of a motor vehicle by another person using such a telephone or other device, is guilty of an offence.” -- Dave Haynes <dave at ep90.com> "When buying a used car, punch the buttons on the radio. If all the stations are rock and roll, there's a good chance the transmission is shot." - Larry Lujack
- Previous message: [aprssig] No More Mobile APRS In California
- Next message: [aprssig] RC-D710 APRS display head on an old IC-2AT HT
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
