[aprssig] APRS Open Spec

[Ron McCoy]

None that I can think of.

What about putting the 1.0 spec on a page and so that people can start 
editing it to incorporate the addenda?

The discussion pages can be used to raise areas of ambiguity and seek 
consensus on proper wording.

Cap Pennell wrote:
> Any reason to not use our international APRS wiki for useful info?
>
> http://info.aprs.net
>
> 73, Cap KE6AFE
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org
>> [mailto:aprssig-bounces at lists.tapr.org]On Behalf Of Ron McCoy
>> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 10:46 AM
>> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS Open Spec
>>
>>
>> Obviously, I agree. :)
>>
>> I have server space along with wiki and polling software but very little 
>> time to support a site.
>>
>> I'll watch and see if anyone better positioned steps up to help us with 
>> resources. 
>>     
> <snip>
>
> _______________________________________________
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at lists.tapr.org
> https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
>