[aprssig] APRS Open Spec

[Scott Miller]

(Trying really hard not to get into the IP debate - already erased two 
draft rants on the subject.)

> Rather than a free-for-almost-all edit process, it calls for an editor 
> to be named, who will be the central collector of proposed changes, and 
> who go through a defined process for approval before making the 
> revisions for voting upon. 

Arnie's absolutely right.  These projects usually need a benevolent 
dictator to drive them effectively.  And no, I'm not volunteering, 
though I'll be happy to contribute to the content.

Any new spec ought to have a little more on network behavior, I think. 
Nail down the specifics of WIDEn-N behavior, define a common 
timeslotting system, and so on.

Scott
N1VG