[aprssig] HT/mic DTMF standards
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduTue Sep 30 21:00:40 UTC 2008
- Previous message: [aprssig] HT/mic DTMF standards
- Next message: [aprssig] HT/mic DTMF standards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mark, I agree completely... But... On the other hand... > It should be the same as on a cell phone. > That is what will be expected by "younger" hams. > J = 5 > K = 55 > L = 555 > 5 = 5555 But danged if ECHOLINK didn't do it the other way... Even though my APRStt spec and the kenwoods were out in 2001 before echolink did callsigns.. > it should be the same as MOST telephones. > 7 = PQRS7 > 9 = WXYZ9 But danged if neither Kenwood or Echolink did it that way.. UG... > At 03:28 PM 9/30/2008, you wrote: > > >> Anyone that wants to add to the table > > >> send in your limits ... > > > > > THD7 has 16 with 1=QZ > > > D700 has 16 with 1=QZ > > > FT470 has ?? with 7=PQRS > > > FT-51R has 16 wiht 1=QZ > > > TH-79a has 16 No Alpha at all. > > > VX-7R has 16 with 7=pqrs > > > >Now then we need opinions also on the selection code? > >Is it multi-key presses to cycle through the single key options, > >IE L is encoded as "555" or is it encoded as "53" or "35" as in > >Echolink? > > > >Bob, WB4APR > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >aprssig mailing list > >aprssig at lists.tapr.org > >https://lists.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] HT/mic DTMF standards
- Next message: [aprssig] HT/mic DTMF standards
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
