[aprssig] Building a new digi (RX performance?)
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Apr 1 22:49:13 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Building a new digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Building a new digi (RX performance?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> The T2-301 will actually do 9 or 10 watts > if you crank it up all the way. Assuming > you're not using it on commercial frequencies, I'm sure the radio specs are very good on receive sensitivity too, but what really matters is how well the combination of radio and TNC can decode received packets. We have done some testing over the years and have seen as high as 20 dB or more decoding problems (usually due to other people's transmitted signals formed by just plug-n-playing a TNC to a xmtr and not adjusting levels.. If you listen to 144.39 in the USA, I'd say 80% of the transmitted signals are an embarassement. I use the TH-D7 as a bench mark, since so many of them are out there, and they are an all-in one factory integrated receiver and decoding system. I have found that they can decode signals down to one bar on the LCD display. We measured that minimum signal as -117 dBm I wonder if you have done any testing of your combination as to on-air receive and packet decode performance? Although decode performance on a tracker isnt usually that important, it is when it is placed in digipeater service. ... Just curious. Thanks Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Building a new digi
- Next message: [aprssig] Building a new digi (RX performance?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
