[aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood
Andrew Rich vk4tec at tech-software.netMon Dec 28 21:49:26 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood
- Next message: [aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood (MicE decoding)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
My point exactly There is a big gap between making a kit and designing a kit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Miller" <scott at opentrac.org> To: <bruninga at usna.edu>; "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> Cc: "'Andrew Rich'" <vk4tec at tech-software.net> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2009 2:43 AM Subject: Re: [aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood >> Decoding the Mic-E format is very simple, and especially in a >> pic chip. A simple offset subtraction of the binary value of >> the Mic-E character yields the numeric value of latitude or >> longitude etc... > > Especially in a PIC chip? How do you figure? > > My decoder is around 36 lines of C code. I suppose it's better than the > Base91 format for embedded use - there, lookup tables are about the only > practical option. > > > Scott > N1VG -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.430 / Virus Database: 270.14.121/2589 - Release Date: 12/27/09 09:18:00
- Previous message: [aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood
- Next message: [aprssig] Dear Mr Kenwood (MicE decoding)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
