[aprssig] Text Messaging Radios (a simple use)
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduWed Feb 11 23:31:45 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Text Messaging Radios (a simple use)
- Next message: [aprssig] Text Messaging Radios (a simple use)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>> Here is a very fundamental and simple >> application of [DTMF checkin to a net]. >> [To help ease] congestion on the main >> voice net... > > So, instead of using voice for the initial > "hail" you're just using another method. > [DTMF on an alternate channel with a visual > display under the nose of net control]. > You have no idea if your message didn't get > through, net control is taking a potty break, > or if other stations' traffic has a higher > priority then yours. Sure do. No difference than by giving your callsign by voice. If the net control responds, he heard you. If he doesn't respond within due time, then he didn't. No difference than checking in on voice, EXCEPT that you did not take up valuable net time and interrupt the present flow of traffic to check in. Clearly if the net is uncluttered and the channel is clear, the voice checkin works very well. But the DTMF backdoor could let you checkin or interrupt net control if needed. > The more I hear about this, the more I > think it's a solution in search of a > problem. Yes, exactly. Just another tool in the amateur radio's operator's tool box to consider as ways to offset all the chatter on the main net frequency during an event. If it doesn't apply, don't use it. I can't believe these radios have been out there for a dozen years and no one has developed good applications for these features. Bob, WB4APR
- Previous message: [aprssig] Text Messaging Radios (a simple use)
- Next message: [aprssig] Text Messaging Radios (a simple use)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
