Order Tray | Contact Us | Home | SIG Lists

[aprssig] Replacement binaries for UIDIGI ? (stand-alone digi software)

Gregg Wonderly gregg at wonderly.org
Sat Feb 28 18:48:08 UTC 2009

Scott Miller wrote:
>> It does look like everybody is keeping their TNC2 softwares as secret, and
>> distributing only binaries.   Understandable when it was current stuff,
>> but why still ?
> Probably for the same reason hams like to sell 20 year old HTs for 80% 
> of the purchase price.  We assign greater value to our stuff than is 
> realistic.
> Is the processor socketed on most TNC2 clones?  If so, you could just 
> skip the Z80 programming entirely and build yourself a daughter board 
> that'd plug in to the processor socket.  You've already got the RAM, 
> RTC, and all of the radio interface stuff.  These days it's not hard to 
> squeeze a decent microcontroller between the pins on a 0.600" wide DIP 
> board.
> Granted, you'd probably have $15 of parts in there rather than a $2 
> EPROM, but it'd be a lot more flexible.  And you could work in C, Java, 
> or whatever instead of Z80 assembly.

	ld	bc,mvcnt
	ld	hl,iosrc
	ld	de,iodst
	ld	a,any
	or	a
	jr	nz,again
	jr	wait

What Scott, you don't have fond memories of Z80 assembly?  I (re)wrote a whole
kermit protocol implementation and UI in Z80 assembly in the 80s...  Does
that date me :-)  You are absolutely right though, you can put a much more 
powerful processor on board that device in a smaller package and get some real 
work done.  You could even spend some time to make it something that others 
could assemble and use!

Gregg Wonderly

More information about the aprssig mailing list