[aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVLSystem ???
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr)
ldeffenb at homeside.to
Sun Jan 4 13:35:45 CST 2009
The FCC doesn't care one IOTA for what is gated to APRS-IS. What
matters is whether or not the callsign is broadcast over the RF. If
this person/people has figured out a way to broadcast the callsign in a
non-APRS-gate-able packet, he/she can still be honoring the law but yet
not leave traces in APRS-IS. You'd have to be RF-local to the
transmitter to prove that the callsign is NOT being broadcast.
Remember, in most free countries, you are are innocent until proven
guilty. APRS-IS logged packets don't count in my book as proof of a
lack of callsign broadcast. Since this is occurring inside the
boundaries of the United States of America, innocence is definitely to
If I were anywhere local, I'd still try to arrange an encounter with the
transmitter to ask about his/her equipment and what callsign they're
operating under. Not accusing of a violation, but curiously
inquisitive. Besides, we'll need information from the person to get an
FCC warning issued anyway.
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Just my <insert small monetary amount here> worth
Doug Ferrell, KD4MOJ wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> AFAIK, so long as one sends a legal identification packet one may use
> a tactical call, if you will, in the position packet. Public service
> organizations do this all the time. Given that, the truck driver could
> easily be legal, just using the ETI-x tactical call while sending a
> ham call sign outside the position packet. Does it rub against
> convention? Certainly,.. and may even be on the fringe of illegal IF
> being used commercially.
> I would be careful about marching up and introducing yourself without
> some tact and knowledge that some do not play by the same rules.
> Len Revelle N9IJ
> n9ij at comcast.net
> Len there is no callsign associated with any of his/her packets:
> 2009-01-03 17:10:56 UTC:
> ETI-2>SV0Q6U,WIDE1-1,N4CKV-1,WIDE2*,qAR,N4CKV-4:`s&4l^xu/"6\}On the Way!
> 2009-01-03 18:08:10 UTC:
> 2009-01-03 18:10:48 UTC:
> 2009-01-03 19:01:33 UTC:
> 2009-01-03 21:44:54 UTC:
> 2009-01-03 21:45:23 UTC:
> 2009-01-04 04:59:40 UTC:
> ETI-2>APT312,KK5PP-3,WIDE1*,WIDE2-1,qAR,K5JRA-1:>MT8000FA v1.0
> So if it's a ham, he is not being legal.
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
More information about the aprssig