[aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVLSystem ???
kb8uih at sbcglobal.net
Sun Jan 4 17:16:23 CST 2009
Yes but how can making a voice transmission on that frequency be heard? Morse transmission is in same boat. That gets back to my post about physically monitoring with a tape recorder of some such device to hear the transmissions. The operator would have to speak at least @10 mins to keep up with the identification requirement.
--- On Sun, 1/4/09, Len Revelle <n9ij at comcast.net> wrote:
> From: Len Revelle <n9ij at comcast.net>
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Another Bootlegger Using APRS As a Commercial AVLSystem ???
> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org>
> Date: Sunday, January 4, 2009, 4:41 PM
> Sort of my point. He could also ID in voice and remain
> Len Revelle N9IJ
> n9ij at comcast.net
> On Jan 4, 2009, at 2:00 PM, Scott Miller wrote:
> >> Is this direct on RF? It doesn't look like it.
> He could *legally* be
> >> IDing with no path at the end of every 10 minutes.
> I'm not saying
> >> this
> >> is probable, but not enough data for enforcement
> > He could also be ID'ing on CW (dumb, but legally
> OK) so even if he
> > drives within direct range of an IGate, packet logs
> are not proof of
> > illegal use.
> > Scott
> > N1VG
> > _______________________________________________
> > aprssig mailing list
> > aprssig at tapr.org
> > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig
> aprssig mailing list
> aprssig at tapr.org
More information about the aprssig