kg4wsv at gmail.com
Mon Jan 5 06:56:47 CST 2009
On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 11:54 PM, Kurt Kochendarfer <ke7kus at gmail.com> wrote:
> The real issue with Ben's suggestion, apart from someone already in the
> business implementing it as an "add-on", is cost. Hosting of the scale
> needed to support a global APRS Mail service would cost a significant
> amount of money. You would either need a hosting agreement with an
> existing company (high monthly cost), or you would need a big fat
> internet pipe and about $10000-15000 in hardware to do it yourself.
> (High monthly cost and high hardware cost.)
I'm also "in the business", and an email server capable of dealing
with APRS<->email traffic certainly doesn't need to be that well
endowed, simply because APRS doesn't/can't handle that much traffic.
The _work_ involved in doing it right would be plenty, and it needs to
be hosted in a datacenter and backed up in another datacenter
(preferably geographically and network-wise somewhat distant from the
first), but the hardware and bandwidth requirements just aren't all
that much, IMO.
More information about the aprssig