Pete Loveall AE5PL Lists
hamlists at ametx.com
Mon Jan 5 12:04:48 CST 2009
Good point, Jason. However, I thought the idea is APRS, not APRS-IS, <=> E-mail. According to the spec, an APRS message packet has "max 67 chars" for the message and that should be the upper constraint since this is targeted to RF users IMO.
Pete Loveall AE5PL
pete at ae5pl dot net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason KG4WSV
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 11:56 AM
> gack! Think maybe you should check the APRS-IS design first? I don't
> know the upper limit on packet size, but it would pay to check it out.
> Think "APRS messages", not "small email".
More information about the aprssig