[aprssig] PHG calculators
Pentti Gronlund pentti.gronlund at tut.fiMon Jan 12 18:50:18 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robert Bruninga writes: > > There is another weakness in the PHG > > notation where the front-to-back > > ratio is left out to the reader's > > imagination. > > Actually, it was originall specified as about 6 dB so that the > range in the forward direction is assumed to be at least double > the range in the back direction. But again, it is only an > indication that a given station has a favored direction, nothing > more. 6 dB of front-to-back ratio is close enough to what you get out of an offset-mount dipole set. This may well be more than 90% of the cases with offset in PHG. > > Consequently the offset or directional > > patterns plotted out of PHG are quite > > speculative and not even close to useful. > > By that definition, nothing short of a full terrain mapping RF > propogation system would be "close to useful", which is beyond > the scope of APRS. I have to agree with that to some amount. On the other hand, it would be quite handy to have a PHG to gain/front-to-back/3 dB BW tool in RadioMobile. > HAMS have the good feel for VHF propogation and are able to use > that knowledge to infer the general larger coverage of a higher > station compared to a lower station, and one with a favored > direction compared to omni's. Some do. Many don't. Just my thoughts, too, only meant to increase knowledge through serious discussion :) Benjamin OH3BK -- Live Reports from the Taxman's Paradise!
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
