[aprssig] PHG calculators
Dave Baxter Dave at emv.co.ukTue Jan 13 12:39:51 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG part II
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sounds like I touched a nerve with PHG. No wonder then why many people do not use it. Dave, G0WBX. > -----Original Message----- > From: Jack Spitznagel [mailto:frawg at frawg.org] > Sent: 12 January 2009 21:36 > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: Re: [aprssig] PHG calculators > > Sounds like some folks are asking for something like the six > digit extension PHG's (PHGDRA/ - > Power,Height,Gain,Directivity,Rate,Altitude) > that are used by the PropNET Project folks. The altitude of > terrain is supposed to help to differentiate between what the > listener stations receive when comparing the guy in the > valley using his tower as a 10 M vertical and the guy on the > mountain top using a retuned CB vertical. It does not have a > front to back value in it either. > > So my beacon text on Propnet is > "kd4iz>hy:[fm19oo]phg221066/^967D" Using a QRP radio 40ft > vertical with unity gain, omnidirectional pattern, rig > beaconing every 10 minutes, antenna parked in the yard where > the ASL height is 680ft. > Obvious... the rest is my call, band (hy = 10M), my locator > FM19oo, and the ^967D at the end is a checksum that helps us > analyze the path quality by verifying the data was copied accurately. > > Reminds me to ask why we don't have a front-to-back ratio > value for beams and arrays... although it may be not that > useful for PropNET. Most folks use verticals which are unity > and direction neutral because we are probing in all directions... > > > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] PHG calculators
- Next message: [aprssig] PHG part II
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
