[aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 55, Issue 22
eseacord at cloud9.net eseacord at cloud9.netMon Jan 19 19:31:00 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Failed APRS?
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 55, Issue 22
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi gang New York State specifically exempts ham as we are also considered emergency vehicles to an extent. I don't know the law offhand but you can find it by looking it up on New York States DMV web site. Regards Quoting aprssig-request at tapr.org: > Send aprssig mailing list submissions to > aprssig at tapr.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > aprssig-request at tapr.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > aprssig-owner at tapr.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of aprssig digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Somewhat OT - Seeking Ham-friendly mobile cell > banlegislation? (Gary) > 2. Re: Somewhat OT - Seeking Ham-friendly mobile cell > banlegislation? (Mark Fellhauer) > 3. Re: Programming Language Advice (Jeff N0JUH) > 4. Re: Programming Language Advice (Tapio Sokura) > 5. Re: Programming Language Advice (J.C. Wren) > 6. Re: Programming Language Advice (Chuck.Gooden at comcast.net) > 7. Re: Programming Language Advice (J.C. Wren) > 8. test.....please ignore. (Chuck Gooden) > 9. Re: Programming Language Advice (Ray Wells) > 10. Re: Programming Language Advice (Ray Wells) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:28:30 -0800 > From: "Gary" <n6lrv at cox.net> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Somewhat OT - Seeking Ham-friendly mobile cell > banlegislation? > To: "'K7FTP'" <k7ftp at k7ftp.net>, "'TAPR APRS Mailing List'" > <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <003601c9799a$90c4a260$6402a8c0 at Gary> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > Check out California's new hands free law here; > <http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=3025707913+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve> > See vehicle codes 23123 thru 23125. > Much debate took place beforehand and some of it was the result of > idiotic legislators trying to ban > all communications devices while mobile until their eyes were > opened to the fact that many > utilities, municipal agencies, taxis, amateur operators, and much > more are not only protected > (somewhat) from such legislation but also not the cause for so many > traffic collisions that begin > with "distraction by cell phone" highlighting the need for this law > to begin with. Even though the > law has been in effect for more than a year now I still see > numerous drivers every day on their > phones(the old fashioned way) while driving on the highway. > > Most importantly, please do not confuse "wireless telephone" with > the legacy "phone" term used in > radio as they are not the same thing. The legislation literally > refers to common carrier cellular > type phones commonly used by the masses to distract themselves > while driving their motor vehicle > into the rear of another motor vehicle. > Gary > > -----Original Message----- > From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On > Behalf Of K7FTP > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 2:10 PM > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List > Subject: [aprssig] Somewhat OT - Seeking Ham-friendly mobile cell > banlegislation? > > Can anyone point me to an example of enacted (yet ham-friendly) mobile cell > phone ban legislation? > > One of our wonderful nanny-state legislators wants to ban everything > including two-way radio except in an emergency. > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:13:28 -0800 > From: Mark Fellhauer <sparkfel at qwest.net> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Somewhat OT - Seeking Ham-friendly mobile cell > banlegislation? > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20090118130500.036735d0 at pop.sxfl.qwest.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > > California also ammended their motor vehicle laws to ALLOW the placement of > portable GPS receivers on the windshield. The restriction is that the GPSr > be placed in the lower extreme right or left portion of the windscreen. > > Twice now, once in Las Vegas and once in Phoenix, police cars (one > unmarked) have come up behind me while I was talking on my cell phone (not > hands-free) while driving and given me a short blast on the siren and a > little flashing light action, but then have driven on by. Just a friendly > reminder from them not to do that... > > 73, > > Mark > KC7BXS > > > At 10:28 AM 1/18/2009, Gary wrote: >> Check out California's new hands free law here; >> <http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=3025707913+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve> >> See vehicle codes 23123 thru 23125. > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:15:41 -0600 > From: Jeff N0JUH <jefflists08 at corrt.com> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4973C62D.7000800 at corrt.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Bill Vodall WA7NWP wrote: >> I really hope folks here aren't encouraging anybody new to scripting >> to start with PERL. That's a really bad idea. >> >> PERL is an incredible language and I use it every day. It is somewhat >> cross platform and that's good, but the excitement in the programming >> world these days is Python and others. > > I'll second this. If you are going to learn a new programming language, > want to do quick'n'dirty scripts, but also want to develop some serious > applications someday, python is the way to go. I've been using it for > over ten years: everything from shell script replacements to terrain > modeling (with graphics) to large web-based inventory systems. It's > easy to learn, has a huge set of libraries, makes for fast development, > scales very well and is very sound from a computer science POV. > > Why do the big software companies use C and C++? For optimum > performance, mostly. But a number of them do their *prototypes* in > python first. Most of Google's search engine product was originally > developed in python. Most ham software would work just fine at python > speeds - you can still do critical modules in C/C++ and link to them > from python. > > Is python the best for embedded systems or other small-footprint > applications? Not really. C and C++ rule there. Though programmers > who prefer a higher-level / fast prototyping approach should check out > lua (www.lua.org) > > my two cents... > > -- Jeff n0juh > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 02:43:31 +0200 > From: Tapio Sokura <oh2kku at iki.fi> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4973CCB3.1040104 at iki.fi> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Ray Wells wrote: >> Thanks for all the additional replies. I think the only language I'm >> proficient in at the moment is profane, after all the syntax errors from >> perl :-) > > Two suggestions for learning and using perl: always begin your scripts > with "use strict;" and "use warnings;". They force you to be a bit more > disciplined when coding and warn you of things that could lead to > trouble. Taint checks (-T command line parameter) are sometimes useful > as well. > > Tapio > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:58:36 -0500 > From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: > <17434f2e0901181658r69369bd1u8fca50f96fde4c38 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > And for Python scripts, the first line should be: > #!/bin/perl > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Tapio Sokura <oh2kku at iki.fi> wrote: > >> Ray Wells wrote: >> > Thanks for all the additional replies. I think the only language I'm >> > proficient in at the moment is profane, after all the syntax errors from >> > perl :-) >> >> Two suggestions for learning and using perl: always begin your scripts >> with "use strict;" and "use warnings;". They force you to be a bit more >> disciplined when coding and warn you of things that could lead to >> trouble. Taint checks (-T command line parameter) are sometimes useful >> as well. >> >> Tapio >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090118/e1e12841/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 01:06:20 +0000 (UTC) > From: Chuck.Gooden at comcast.net > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: > > <846050346.4382291232327180332.JavaMail.root at sz0039a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > > > > No that's not correct, for Python scripts you use: > > > > #!/bin/python > > > > For Perl scripts use: > > > > #!/bin/perl > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> > To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> > Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:58:36 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > > And for Python scripts, the first line should be: > > > #!/bin/perl? > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090119/78affe8c/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:45:12 -0500 > From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: > <17434f2e0901181745t2fc1b6ebpaa3ed9fa8869ab95 at mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Ah say, ah say, that's sarcasm there, son, sarcasm</foghorn leghorn> > Can't stand Python. Out of the 40 or so languages I've ever used, COBOL and > Python are the only two that I'd rather flip burgers than use. > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 8:06 PM, <Chuck.Gooden at comcast.net> wrote: > >> No that's not correct, for Python scripts you use: >> >> >> >> #!/bin/python >> >> >> >> For Perl scripts use: >> >> >> >> #!/bin/perl >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> >> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> >> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:58:36 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice >> >> And for Python scripts, the first line should be: >> >> #!/bin/perl >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> >> > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090118/605106ad/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:52:48 -0600 > From: Chuck Gooden <Chuck.Gooden at comcast.net> > Subject: [aprssig] test.....please ignore. > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4973DCF0.2080801 at comcast.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:20:03 +1100 > From: Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4973D543.1070809 at exemail.com.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed > > Methinks you missed the twisted humour. > > Ray vk2tv > > Chuck.Gooden at comcast.net wrote: >> >> No that's not correct, for Python scripts you use: >> >> >> >> #!/bin/python >> >> >> >> For Perl scripts use: >> >> >> >> #!/bin/perl >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "J.C. Wren" <jcwren at jcwren.com> >> To: "TAPR APRS Mailing List" <aprssig at tapr.org> >> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 6:58:36 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central >> Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice >> >> And for Python scripts, the first line should be: >> >> >> #!/bin/perl >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 11:48:38 +1100 > From: Ray Wells <vk2tv at exemail.com.au> > Subject: Re: [aprssig] Programming Language Advice > To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> > Message-ID: <4973CDE6.1060006 at exemail.com.au> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Tapio Sokura wrote: >> Ray Wells wrote: >> >>> Thanks for all the additional replies. I think the only language I'm >>> proficient in at the moment is profane, after all the syntax errors from >>> perl :-) >>> >> >> Two suggestions for learning and using perl: always begin your scripts >> with "use strict;" and "use warnings;". They force you to be a bit more >> disciplined when coding and warn you of things that could lead to >> trouble. Taint checks (-T command line parameter) are sometimes useful >> as well. >> >> Tapio >> >> _______________________________________________ >> aprssig mailing list >> aprssig at tapr.org >> https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >> >> > I'm using both of those, thanks. > > Ray vk2tv > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > End of aprssig Digest, Vol 55, Issue 22 > *************************************** > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090119/0896e06d/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] Failed APRS?
- Next message: [aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 55, Issue 22
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
