[aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations
djhuff at rockwellcollins.com djhuff at rockwellcollins.comTue Jan 20 21:46:29 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations
- Next message: [aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Just to add a couple observations. I agree with Steve to always do constant weather rate. 1. Weather stations based on rapid change sounds hard. You have temp, rainfall, humidity, wind speed, wind direction, barometer, and maybe dew point. Which one of those is important enough for change detection, or more correctly, how do you do change detection on 6 items easily. What are the limits of rapid change? 2. Wind Direction is notorious for rapid changes, I have seen the direction change 2 or 3 times in a minute. That many packets based on change would be bad for the network. 3. Most weather stations use a data averaging routine, the Lacrosse units I have used in the past were 5-7 minutes per update for wireless, and 4-5 minutes per update wired. Sending data any faster than about 5 minute intervals is just repeating old data & wasting APRS bandwidth. MANY PEOPLE FORGET THAT. 4. I have setup my weather station to use a faster rate of about 10 or 15 minutes in the spring & summer, when severe weather strikes more often, then run it down to 20 minute update rates int the fall & winter when the weather settles down. I recommend that similar idea for others doing weather on APRS. 5. As for paths, I suggest that is a local thing to be worked out among the local APRS sysops. Back when I lived in a fringe area at the very edge of radar coverage, the weather service specifically asked me to change my path to do a 3 hop path so my data was visible on the APRS station in the NWS office. I got flack for it from people living way out of state, they sent me emails, and I just sent them a copy of the NWS email specifically asking for a change, that usually shut them up quickly. 6. You also need to differentiate APRS weather sent via RF versus weather sent ONLY to APRS-IS, many stations do 2 different rates. David Steve Noskowicz <noskosteve at yahoo.com> Sent by: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org 01/20/2009 02:00 PM Please respond to noskosteve at yahoo.com; Please respond to TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> To TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org> cc Subject Re: [aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations > 30 minutes is too slow for most situations. ... > for other types of weather ...rates of five minutes are > desired by many ... Sounds obvious to me. This suggests a Wx station "Smart Beacon" algorithm. Wx condition change rate handled just like vehicle speed. No change -> 30 min _or more_ Rapid change -> 5 min. 73, Steve, K9DCI -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090120/f9fc375b/attachment.htm
- Previous message: [aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations
- Next message: [aprssig] Weather Station Path/Rate Recommendations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
