[aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
Jack Spitznagel frawg at frawg.orgMon Jan 26 16:18:08 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Next message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 1/26/2009 10:59 AM, Ben Jackson wrote: > This *is* a concern and I'm curious as to how the FCC looks at paging > for amateur stations by amateur stations. The only real "paging > network" I've seen is based in Germany. Nothing on this side of the > Atlantic. > > I'm sure there are people smarter then me on this list. Any opinions on > this? Part 97 is murky at best. > It seems to me that the FCC would be concerned if one was running a "paging service" that could be accessed from landline, but why would they object to an APRS/amateur repeater transmitting pager codes/tones if all other ID requirements are met and was only triggered by amateur initiated messaging transmissions? Why would they care if a *receiver* has been modified to receive an amateur radio frequency? It is certainly not at all like the issue of "unblocking" a receiver for use as a scanner on cellular telephone frequencies. Jack - kd4iz
- Previous message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Next message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
