[aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
Duane Whittingham n9ssn at arrl.netMon Jan 26 22:55:07 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Next message: [aprssig] Pagers as part of the Text Messaging Initiative
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
True. At 04:46 PM 1/26/2009, you wrote: >Is beaconing no longer permissable? It was always in the eye of the >beholder. > >Text and URLs mangled by my iPhone >Kenton A. Hoover >+1.415.350.3641 >shibumi at mail.marchordie.org > >On Jan 26, 2009, at 14:36, Duane Whittingham <n9ssn at arrl.net> wrote: > > > I wonder if some consider it one way so its broadcasting? > > > > If it can be defined as informative like a bulletin then maybe? > > > > Duane - N9SSN > > > > > > > > At 09:59 AM 1/26/2009, you wrote: > > > > On 1/26/2009, "Earl Needham" <needhame1 at plateautel.net wrote: > > > > Ben Jackson wrote: > > Older, working pagers are a dime a dozen on the used market and > > there are > > some people who have refitted them to work on Amateur bands[2]. > > With the > > fact that there (quite literally) buckets full of working pagers at > > HamFests, why not have a "messagegate" that takes APRS messages to > > stations and translates them to a message destined for a POCSAG > > compatible pager. There were certain KAM TNCs that could encode > > POCSAG > > natively > > > > > > Years ago I had a pager converted to receive on 146.76, our local > > repeater. We had a new controller that would send paging tones to > > open > > it up. Sadly, after about 3 uses, the "old fogeys" decided it was > > illegal. We had quite the discussion, and one of them finally called > > the FCC monitoring office in Powder Springs, Ga, and simply asked > > them,"Paging isn't legal on amateur frequencies, is it?" > > > > This *is* a concern and I'm curious as to how the FCC looks at paging > > for amateur stations by amateur stations. The only real "paging > > network" I've seen is based in Germany. Nothing on this side of the > > Atlantic. > > > > I'm sure there are people smarter then me on this list. Any opinions > > on > > this? Part 97 is murky at best. > > > > If you try this, be prepared for other "old fogeys" to step in and > > try to take the fun our of amateur radio. > > > > Fogeys don't need to be old :). Every project needs to be championed > > by > > someone who can tilt at windmills. The next step was to call the FCC > > and > > the ARRL to get their interpretation of the tomes. Paging in this > > sense > > may be something that is not supported under Part 97, which is part of > > the reason I haven't tried to really push this (other reasons being > > time and money). I just decided to toss it out there in this thread > > partially to get input from other people regarding it. > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > Amateur Radio Operator > > Duane Whittingham - N9SSN > > Skywarn, ARES, SATERN > > City of Chicago CERT Member > > Red Cross Disaster Services Technology Member > > Red Cross ECRV Certified > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprssig mailing list > > aprssig at tapr.org > > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >_______________________________________________ >aprssig mailing list >aprssig at tapr.org >https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig ------------------------------------------------------- Amateur Radio Operator Duane Whittingham - N9SSN Skywarn, ARES, SATERN City of Chicago CERT Member Red Cross Disaster Services Technology Member Red Cross ECRV Certified
- Previous message: [aprssig] Doubling APRS messaging in ham radio overnight
- Next message: [aprssig] Pagers as part of the Text Messaging Initiative
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
