[aprssig] Pagers as part of the Text Messaging Initiative

[Scott Miller]

> Which I think seems fair interpretation, but I think there is a large
> grey area. However, this is a question for the landsharks. Would this be
> a question for someone at the ARRL? Do they provide interpretation of
> Part 97 for sticky legal conundrums that we are currently engaging in?
> 
> Of course, if this is deemed non-kosher, is the next step to poke the
> FCC? How the heck does anyone even do this?

Lawyers and maybe lobbyists are one way.  In theory the ARRL ought to be 
looking out for our interests and should be able to help out - does 
anyone know if they're active legally besides tower issues and BPL?  I 
never hear anything about VHF/UHF issues.  I can think of a few proposed 
rule changes to bring before the FCC.

Scott
N1VG