[aprssig] Pagers as part of the Text Messaging Initiative

[Ben Jackson]

On 1/27/2009, "Steve Dimse" <steve at dimse.com> wrote:

>
>On Jan 27, 2009, at 12:02 AM, Bob Bruninga wrote:
>>
>> I think that statement would appear to show a fundamental lack of
>> understanding of APRS.
>
>No, it would appear to show you have a fundamental lack of
>understanding of APRS. Or more accurately, it shows a difference in
>our definitions of APRS, one we have fought over for a decade. Your
>definition of APRS is a concept that only exists in your mind, the way
>you want people to use the system. My definition of APRS is the way
>people actually use, and want to use, the system.

Children! Children! Any more bickering and I'll turn this mailing list
around and we'll all head home! :)

This isn't helping the discussion at all. Let's just agree to disagree
and focus on a way to possibly implement this in a safe and legal manner.