[aprssig] APRS legality
pagreen at gmail.com
Tue Jan 27 10:24:12 CST 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
> You are correct. I disagree completely with your definition
> that attempts to turn APRS into a lifeless one-way,
> lights-on-nobody-home, broadcast-for-public consumption system,
> on which no one can find anyone to communicate with in real
This is what everybody thinks when I try to get them to use APRS.
There is basically no one there. I like digital communications so I
don't really care to talk to someone running the PL100 system because
the majority of the time, they are out of range and it's not digital
> Just my opinion.
> Bob, WB4APR
73 de Pat --- KA9SCF.
More information about the aprssig