[aprssig] APRS legality

[Patrick Green]

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Robert Bruninga <bruninga at usna.edu> wrote:
[...]
> You are correct.  I disagree completely with your definition
> that attempts to turn APRS into a lifeless one-way,
> lights-on-nobody-home, broadcast-for-public consumption system,
> on which no one can find anyone to communicate with in real
> time.

This is what everybody thinks when I try to get them to use APRS.
There is basically no one there.  I like digital communications so I
don't really care to talk to someone running the PL100 system because
the majority of the time, they are out of range and it's not digital
communications.

[...]
>
>
> Just my opinion.
> Bob, WB4APR
>
>

Mine too.

73 de Pat --- KA9SCF.