[aprssig] aprs traffic

[Mark Cheavens]

And how many antenna's, feed line, radio's, TNC's and most 
importantly radio sites do YOU keep and maintain.

As the keeper of many such sites I can tell you I am NOT interested 
in keeping 3x the equipment running!

GOOD radio sites are limited and expensive. I have feed line and 
antenna restrictions on most of my sites.

"More" is not the solution! More efficient IS.

Mark
KC5EVE
At 07:40 PM 1/29/2009, you wrote:
>I honestly think that the future of aprs is to have a tracker, weather
>frequency, and a two way message net frequency.
>since most of the telemetry weather, taker's are on fixed freq radios, leave
>them on 144.390, since pretty much all two way message set ups use a tunable
>radio.
>make one freq one-way and one freq two way.
>it could work very well.
>and have a gateway server to pass messages between  the two.
>I love my trakers, and I love my pk-900,kpc3, pk88 and tiny2 mk II  and other
>tnc keyboard set up.
>i think we compromise.
>And have the best of both worlds.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>i love my
>
>
>
>Quoting aprssig-request at tapr.org:
>
>
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re: APRS legality (Robert Bruninga)
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>aprssig mailing list
>aprssig at tapr.org
>https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig