[aprssig] aprssig Digest, Vol 55, Issue 36

[canoeman at qnet.com]

You know, I'm getting tired of the self declared - selfless wunderkind,
denigrating any suggestion that dissagrees with their empire.
Frankly, were all in this togther.
I have a site up, on a ridge, that I powered up and run and am in the midst of
setting up 4 more.
So keep your whining to yourself.
This is a discussion group, quit being so obnoxious.
You have CHOSEN to put up these sites, no one forced you to.
I am setting up sites as well, but I make suggestions, ask questions, I don't
rant.
You  will get no support if you continue on the track.
And for your info, I spent years, building and maintaining  LARGE, COMMERCIAL
repeater sites from the ground up, so keep your (I'm smarter then you attitude)
to yourself.
I have  BUILT, more commercial radio sites, with "MY OWN" company then you have
visited!
So I understand your point.
Now with that out of the way, lets get back to a DISCUSSION!

Ke6anm



 quote 

> And how many antenna's, feed line, radio's, TNC's and most 
> importantly radio sites do YOU keep and maintain.
> 
> As the keeper of many such sites I can tell you I am NOT interested 
> in keeping 3x the equipment running!
> 
> GOOD radio sites are limited and expensive. I have feed line and 
> antenna restrictions on most of my sites.
> 
> "More" is not the solution! More efficient IS.

> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 11
> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:29:08 +0100
> From: Jon K Hellan <hellan at acm.org>
> Subject: Re: [aprssig] aprs traffic
> To: TAPR APRS Mailing List <aprssig at tapr.org>
> Message-ID: <4982C864.1000508 at acm.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> 
> Scott Miller wrote:
> >> I honestly think that the future of aprs is to have a tracker, weather
> >> frequency, and a two way message net frequency.
> > 
> > Sounds like a job for my new gadget...
> > 
> > https://www.argentdata.com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=112
> > 
> > (Sorry, they're all sold out for the moment.)  You could set it up to do 
> > weather on one frequency and tracking on another using the script
> functions.
> >
> 
> Interesting. It's even got the CE mark. Were you involved in making the
> compliance declaration. Was it hard?
> 
> Jon LA4RT