[aprssig] regional APRS coordinators?
Cap Pennell cap at cruzio.comMon Jul 6 04:36:22 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] regional APRS coordinators?
- Next message: [aprssig] Mailman considered harmful - list bounce settings are bad
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
<snip> > Once you get to Burning Man no one plays radio anyway. Very little > activity. > Dale > It had APRS Coverage last time I was there Yes. Generally this has been a problem of VHF APRS all along. Folks have packet hardware they're not using and a place to leave it powered up (with thoughts that doing so will be helping others). Better questions are: _How many_ APRS users are unable to accomplish their local VHF APRS objectives. Where? Why? If their problems are _proven_ to be a VHF coverage issue, then how often are those problems truly occurring? Best bet for actual usefulness (and VHF network courtesy) in most all cases these days is (at most) _only_ a traceable fill-in digi, ideally in service only for the duration of demonstrated need. 73, Cap KE6AFE
- Previous message: [aprssig] regional APRS coordinators?
- Next message: [aprssig] Mailman considered harmful - list bounce settings are bad
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
