[aprssig] TNCX setups?
The Bland Ranch root at blandranch.netFri Jul 17 06:25:10 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Next message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Quoting Cap Pennell <cap at cruzio.com>: "If the local IGate station can use the digi, or can use another higher digi that the fill-in digi's users can also hear" And this is the problem. The reason for using a fill-in is to get you out of an area not serviced by other high-level digis....like alot of downtown Jackson, CA and other areas around Amador County. You can use a fill-in to get you out, but when you're in the holes and the only thing you can hear is the fill-in, you really don't have a return path. I'm not saying don't use fill-ins. I'm saying they can present their own share of problems. Chuck > Right, but... If the local IGate station can use the digi, or can use > another higher digi that the fill-in digi's users can also hear, then such > messaging (with stations more than one digi hop away) can still work. > > The only problem is we simply can't fit everything on only 1200baud VHF all > the time. > > Often, things can be setup in one manner for "duration of demonstrated true > need" and then conscientiously reduced to be more courteous to all the other > VHF users afterward. > 73, Cap > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On > > Behalf Of The Bland Ranch > > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 4:57 PM > > To: aprssig at tapr.org > > Subject: Re: [aprssig] TNCX setups? > > > > Quoting Cap Pennell <cap at cruzio.com>: > > > > "Most often these days, a simple traceable fill-in digi is far better > > for our > > shared VHF network. A traceable fill-in digi operates packets > > addressed via > > WIDE1-1 or it's own callsign ONLY, as in the final (second one below) > > sample > > setup." > > > > Ya.....but....... > > > > We learned this Field Day that if you want to send queries to use other > > APRS > > features that send back replies, a fill-in digi does not help you, > > since the > > returning data has no knowledge that it HAS to use that fill-in digi to > > get > > back to you. > > > > Another factor to consider when planning the network. > > > > Chuck Bland > > > > Quoting Cap Pennell <cap at cruzio.com>: > > > > > I'd extend the Beacon 3 and Beacon 4 intervals out even further, > > and/or > > > reduce their paths. No help (for it's VHF users) for a digi to > > transmit > > > it's own position packet more broadly than across the next digi hop > > in all > > > directions. Only reduces available airtime for all the other _users_ > > of the > > > VHF freq. > > > > > > A full service WIDEn-N/SSn-N digi like this sample setup (first one > > below) > > > will be in a very good wide area network location, in cooperation > > with all > > > the neighbors, and so will surely be seen on the internet too with > > only a > > > minimal VHF digipath. > > > > > > Most often these days, a simple traceable fill-in digi is far better > > for our > > > shared VHF network. A traceable fill-in digi operates packets > > addressed via > > > WIDE1-1 or it's own callsign ONLY, as in the final (second one below) > > sample > > > setup. > > > (UICall 1: WIDE1-1 and have UIFlood and UITrace empty.) > > > > > > 73, Cap KE6AFE > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: aprssig-bounces at tapr.org [mailto:aprssig-bounces at tapr.org] On > > > > Behalf Of Kai Gunter Brandt > > > > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 1:21 PM > > > > To: bruninga at usna.edu; TAPR APRS Mailing List > > > > Subject: Re: [aprssig] TNCX setups? > > > > > > > > Robert Bruninga wrote: > > > > >> TNC-X with the XDigi module is great as long as the latest > > > > > firmware is > > > > >> used. Now its possible to remote configure it too. > > > > >> > > > > >> It's easy to setup as a Fill-In or a WideN digi with the SSn > > > > >> possibility > > > > >> too. > > > > > > > > > > Can you send us the setup commnds to make it New-N compliant? > > > > > Does it use UIFLOOD and UITRACE? Etc > > > > > > > > > > Bob, WB4APR > > > > > > > > > > > > > A bit modified from www.aprsla.net > > > > > > > > C. Set Digipeater Callsign. :URCALL > > > > A. Set Digipeater Alias. :URDIGI > > > > F. Set UIFlood Callsign. :NOR (Norway use this as > > SSn) > > > > L. Set UIFlood Limit. :7 > > > > T. Set UITrace Callsign. :WIDE > > > > M. Set UITrace Limit. :3 > > > > 1. Set UICall 1. : > > > > 2. Set UICall 2. : > > > > 3. Set UICall 3. : > > > > 4. Set UICall 4. : > > > > 5. Set UICall 5. : > > > > 6. Set UICall 6. : > > > > 7. Set UICall 7. : > > > > 8. Set UICall 8. : > > > > D. Set Dupe Time (x5 secs). :2 > > > > > > > > B. Set Beacons > > > > 0. Beacon Destination Call :APNX01 > > > > 1. Beacon 1 Path : (direct path) > > > > 2. Beacon 2 Path :WIDE2-1 > > > > 3. Beacon 3 Path :WIDE2-2 > > > > 4. Beacon 4 Path :NOR3-3 > > > > > > > > 5. Beacon 1 inteval (x5 secs) :00120 Offset :0 (10.min) > > > > 6. Beacon 2 inteval (x5 secs) :00360 Offset :240 (30.min) > > > > 7. Beacon 3 inteval (x5 secs) :00720 Offset :120 (60min) > > > > 8. Beacon 4 inteval (x5 secs) :00720 Offset :255 (60min) > > > > > > > > A. Beacon 1 text: > > > > ;LA7BR *111111z6023.06N/00514.98Er434.700MHz T097 -2000kHz > > > > > > > > (The modified RX/TX TM-D710 requires the split in kHz as MHz > > doesn't > > > > work) > > > > > > > > B. Beacon 2 text:!0000.00NS00000.00E#PHG0000 W3,NORn SomePlace > > > > C. Beacon 3 text:!0000.00NS00000.00E#PHG0000 W3,NORn SomePlace > > > > D. Beacon 4 text:!0000.00NS00000.00E#PHG0000 W3,NORn SomePlace > > > > > > > > Q. Quit > > > > > > > > > > > > For a Fill-In i use UICall 1: WIDE1-1 and have UIFlood and UITrace > > > > empty. > > > > > > > > Kai Gunter > > > > LA3QMA > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > aprssig mailing list > > > > aprssig at tapr.org > > > > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > aprssig mailing list > > > aprssig at tapr.org > > > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > aprssig mailing list > > aprssig at tapr.org > > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig > >
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Next message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
