[aprssig] TNCX setups? (oops)
Robert Bruninga bruninga at usna.eduFri Jul 17 16:32:07 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Next message: [aprssig] TNCX setups? (proportaional pathing?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OOPS! I was wrong, I appologize to the commenter... Commenter said: >>>> I'd extend the Beacon 3 and Beacon 4 >>>> intervals out even further, and/or >>>> reduce their paths. No help ...for >>>> a digi to transmit it's own position >>>> packet more broadly than across the >>>> next digi hop in all directions. In my response below, I thought he was commenting on the standard New-N settings. Now I see he was commenting on the sample TNC-X settings from Norway. And I agree, those sample settings were too high for beacon 3 and 4. So my comments should have applied to the originals, and so I agree with the above commenter... Though I have lost the originals so I cannot applogize by name. Bob > > I disagree. The purpose of the whole New-N Paradigm was to > eliminate all of the legacy paths, settings and kludges that > had grown up over the dozen years and get to a single > *consistent* network with only one setting WIDEn-N with N > usually 2 or less. > > Included in this was proportional pathing for digi's so that > mobiles passing thrugh would see them within 10 minutes, but > that the further reporting of packets was much less frequent. > The design was a 30 minute beacon via 1 hop, and a 2 hop > beacon every hour. Those 30 and 60 minute beacons that you > propose to reduce represents less than 0.001 of network > capacity and is worth far more than that. > > Further, mucking around with the New-N paradigm recommendd > settings undermines exactly its overall goals! Consistent > performance and consistent expecatations. We don't want to > devolve back into the completely indeterminant network we had > before, where each sysop set his own custom settings and no > one had a clue what to expect from the network! > > Please, follow the New-N paradigm recommendatios completely. > ANd they are a lot more than just using WIDE2-2 at the digi. > They also include at the digi: > > 1) UITRACing of WIDEn-N packets > 2) UIFLOODing of regional SSn-N packets > 3) Proportiojnal Pathing of the digi's beacon > 4) Including then W2,SSn-N in the comment section > 5) Includign in the BText the local Frequency Object > 6) Changing the Overlay to "S" only after all above > > Thanks > Bob, WB4APR > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] TNCX setups?
- Next message: [aprssig] TNCX setups? (proportaional pathing?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
