[aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) ldeffenb at homeside.toWed Jul 22 20:36:28 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Next message: [aprssig] Danger Will Robinson!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Steve, There was discussion both ways, some people believe it should be both ways. There is no technical nor legal reason (on APRS-IS) for one vs the other, although some mistakenly believed these objects would somehow conflict with the real station's position. My final decision was based on the following factors: 1) There's no interference for using the station's callsign 2) The ToCall of APELNK will be google-able and define where the objects are coming from 3) My call will be in the path of the raw packets on the Internet 4) All of the information in the object is controlled by the node's owner 5) I'm only reformatting data, not authoring anything new 6) All information is already available to the public (EchoLink status) Mike (kb8zgl) put it best at 10:39 today: "It would seem odd to me to see my KB8ZGL-R EL object come from someone else's callsign. That would bother me more than seeing it come from my own callsign even though I didn't put it out there." I agree with him wholeheartedly. I really wouldn't want to see some other callsign "owning" my EchoLink Nodes object. I might not like seeing someone else injecting the object, but at least the object acknowledges my "ownership". Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ Steve Dimse wrote: > Maybe I missed something. Didn't everyone agree you should not be > sending data with other hams callsigns as the origin? > > Steve > > On Jul 22, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Lynn W. Deffenbaugh (Mr) wrote: > >> Curt, >> >> Done. Check out the current proposed objects at >> http://ldeffenb.dnsalias.net/EchoLink.txt. It only uses PHG if the >> frequency doesn't adhere to the valid ones listed in >> http://aprs.org/info/freqspec.txt, including the GHz ranges near the >> bottom of that page. Any "invalid" frequency will still be included >> in the status text, but only in its owner-specified format, not in a >> normalized FREQ object. >> >> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ > > > _______________________________________________ > aprssig mailing list > aprssig at tapr.org > https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig >
- Previous message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Next message: [aprssig] Danger Will Robinson!
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
