[aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
Tom Hayward esarfl at gmail.comWed Jul 22 22:47:58 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Next message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Jason KG4WSV<kg4wsv at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Tom Hayward<esarfl at gmail.com> wrote: >> As I count now, there are about 35 full stream >> clients connected to first.aprs.net, > > I counted 115, and third has a few more. I didn't look at second. Yes, you caught me. I only counted clients connected to port 10152 the first time. This time, I put FIRST's status page into a spreadsheet to get some real data. I sorted by "Send bps". 84 clients are above 19000 bps--these have no filter string so I assume the full feed is around 20000 bps. Anyway, 84 full feed clients. I'll do the math for 115 too. Lynn's text file containing all of the example objects is 204KB. Extreme-case, this is sent every 10 minutes (staggered, of course). Google says this equates to 873MB/month (for each full feed): http://www.google.com/search?q=%28%28204+KB+%2F+10+minutes%29%29+*+1+month Multiply that by 84 or 115 clients, and it's an added 72GB or 98GB respectively. Not quite 1TB. http://www.google.com/search?q=%28%28204+KB+%2F+10+minutes%29%29+*+1+month+*+84 Again, these calculations are for the full Echolink object list every 10 minutes. I doubt this would cripple the Core system. I think the value-added to the local APRS operator is worth this cost. But that's just my opinion, feel free to interpret these numbers how you like. Tom KD7LXL
- Previous message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Next message: [aprssig] Gating Objects from Internet to RF (fina?l)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
