[aprssig] APRS and UHF voice
Len N9IJ n9ij at comcast.netTue Jul 28 16:42:12 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I've asked before with no answer from the group. Did we ever settle on a national UHF frequency for APRS? I have considered putting some UHF radios on APRS here. ----- Original Message ----- From: Bill V WA7NWP To: TAPR APRS Mailing List Sent: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Herb wrote: > And don't forget, UHF APRS on 9600 baud works great too! > > Here in the Northwest we have an alternate APRS network on 9600 baud on both > UHF and VHF and both work great..... The several db disadvantage on UHF is actually an advantage for APRS. It makes it more "cellular" so there are less collisions. An additional benefit is we can listen to the VHF channels without having them blocked by the APRS packets. 73 Bill - WA7NWP _______________________________________________ aprssig mailing list aprssig at tapr.org https://www.tapr.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/aprssig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://www.tapr.org/pipermail/aprssig/attachments/20090728/7688257a/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice
- Next message: [aprssig] APRS and UHF voice
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
