[aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
rttyman at ukr.net
Tue Jun 9 12:54:47 CDT 2009
> Is this an accepted (and possibly common) method of defining objects on
> RF? Or would it be better defined as an Item (')') or Object (;)
> defined directly by WX4MLB-3? I suspect it was done as third-party
> traffic to avoid the unique naming issue for objects, but I'm not really
This in not best method if defining objects!
Better use Object indeficator ";" and use ham call of originator in packet,
;146.52*!2806. N/08039. WrPHG7260 NWS MELBOURNE
In third party this packet should be some like this:
}call_of_originator>APOBJ,TCPIP:;146.52>!2806. N/08039. WrPHG7260 NWS MELBOURNE
Possible timestamp should be also present before coordinates...
More information about the aprssig