[aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
rttyman rttyman at ukr.netTue Jun 9 21:42:51 UTC 2009
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello Steve. > It is important to rocognize that WX4MLB did not originate the packet, > so it should not modify it. If we suppose that WX4MLB was not the originator of this packet, but an originator is absent, it not quite well. We don't know why it so, possibly a wrong truncating of packet's content happened in some place... In case if WX4MLB had originate this packet on RF (as suppose Lynn in last message) third party sign "}" should not used here, instead ";" should used with follow Object related format. I think that Lynn can contact with sysop of WX4MLB and ask all details, if interested. Regards, Sergej
- Previous message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Next message: [aprssig] Object Definition vs third-party traffic?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the aprssig mailing list
